By Fr. Felix (African Times Guest Writer)
To many Jew at the time of Jesus the
character of the Samaritans was such that a
Good Samaritan was a contradiction in terms. It
is striking that Luke changes the dialogue
about the two commandments.
In Mark’s and Matthew’s accounts Jesus
answers the question about the
commandments, while in Luke Jesus
challenges the questioner, who then himself
gives the right answer.
The mugging is depicted in the Wadi Qilt, a
ravine running down from Anathoth, just north
of Jerusalem, to Jericho. Its twists and turns
give it ideal opportunities for ambush, and it is
still occupied by (comparatively friendly)
bandits.
It is also striking that, in the lawyer’s reply at
the very end, despite Jesus’ praise of the
rescuer, cannot bring himself to pronounce the
hated name, ‘Samaritan’, and says ‘the one
who…’. The dry humour of the story consists in
the conscientious dilemma of the priest and the
Levite: if the huddled traveller turns out to be
dead, they will incur corpse-defilement and be
unable to perform their sacred duties! This legal
dilemma makes the Samaritan’s attentive
generosity all the more poignant, for a
Samaritan is free of any such hang-ups.
Love shown to the unfortunate and the down-
trodden is always a major theme for Luke. But
note also the Samaritan’s careful
administration of his funds: he gives not a
blank cheque but two days’ wages, which he
will supplement on his return if necessary!
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.